Thoughts on James Webb Telescope (JWTS).

By OP360. Edited on August 12, 2022, at 4:35 a.m. WEST.

OP360.
4 min readAug 22, 2022
NGC 3324 in the Carina Nebula. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, and STScI.

I'm definitely here not to argue whether or not NASA faked the first pictures we got. Theory conspiracists won't be happy. I know!
But, real quick, at the top, wouldn't it be a dumbfounded idea for a billion-dollar prestigious space agency, like NASA with thousands of sharp and higher IQ guys, to make up a picture from scratch rather than altering existing Algeria–Libya coastlines or Nador–al-Husseima gulf pictures?

On a serious note, when we got the first images—the one shown in the post is NGC 3324 in the Carina Nebula, by the way—from the James Webb Space Telescope, and lots of people were feeling a bit small at that moment. Maybe humble. Maybe insignificant.

But here’s something weird—
I’m actually unsure whether I feel very small right now, or very big.

So, when you look at a structure like the cosmic cliffs with seven lightyear tall peaks.
Or, a deep field images that you cannot put your pinky finger on without covering several galaxies, it makes sense to think, OK, so why do we think that anything that happens here on earth matters here at all?

And there are really good human answers
to that question.
Answers like, we give our universe meaning. We matter to each other.

But there are also some like maybe kind of objective answers. When we understand that an area in the sky the size of a grain of sand contains thousands of galaxies that each contain billions of stars, and we say I feel insignificant now.

That is not a way of saying nothing matters. It’s an instinct that something matters, but that mattering is spread throughout what appears to be a basically infinite universe and so, we don’t matter, something matters, just not us, because we are too small to matter.

But I wonder, is size the right measure?

I’ve got a kind of OK understanding of how the universe works, like not great, but maybe a bit better than average and one thing that seems to be basically the case is that there are a bunch of practically infinite fields that cause particles to exist and interact in a number of ways.

And, as evidenced by the presence of oxygen and hydrogen spectra in galaxies billions of lightyears away, the rules appear to be consistent throughout the whole universe.
Now, this is all very complicated, but it’s also not.

It's just physics doing physics things.
But while the universe is astoundingly big.
Indeed very possibly infinite in size, it’s not that big in time.

Now, you might say, actually 13.7 billion years seems like a very long time. Like practically infinite. But no, the universe is young compared to both infiniti, and compared to its eventual life-span.

Life on earth is one eventual continual
chemical system that dates back 3.7 billion years. Which means this wild frolic that includes everything from Brachiosaurus to BTS has existed for 27% of the lifetime of the universe. We do not take up that much space, but we have taken up a lot of time.

So, that’s one way we are bigger than we might think, but here’s another. The vast majority of the particles in the universe do not know they exist. They have never wanted something.
They’ve never looked at something and found it beautiful. They have never built a space telescope.

And, when I say, like the vast majority, I mean that the vast majority. I mean that the number of particles that are part of any system with wants and sensations is so small that they may as well be ignored.
But, we can agree, they should not be ignored. Because they are very strange. And very beautiful. And they know things about themselves and each other.

In your head you have around the same number of neurons as there are stars in the Milky Way galaxy. And those neurons are much smaller than stars, but they are in fact more ordered, and you could argue that each one is more complex. Abu-Hamed al-Ghazali thought to himself the same back at the time, by the way.

If you think galaxies are amazing, just wait until you find out about you.

Now, are we the only chemical system to have built a space telescope?
No. The way I understand the universe, that is an impossibility.
But it also does not seem very common
for the universe to find paths toward waking up.

And to be a part of that. It feels very immense.

All I for sure know, we are undoubtedly the masters of earth, but definitely the universe wasn't purposely designed to sustain life for us. Unless god says otherwise, we're still awaiting an answer.

Until then, peace out!

###

--

--

OP360.
0 Followers

Sunday blogger. Aviation geek. A word nerd. From mathematics to poems anything stimulates my brain.